Learning How to Learn

By Will Kirsop

​

What this piece covers:

• The hidden reasons students struggle to manage their learning

• The science of self-regulated learning

• How planning, execution, and reflection shape academic performance

• The cognitive systems that underpin effective learning

• Practical ways parents and educators can help students take ownership of their learning

​

Empowering students to become self-regulated learners

​

Many capable students are working harder than ever, yet increasingly feel overwhelmed. Parents see the late nights. Teachers see the gaps between potential and performance. Students feel the quiet frustration of effort failing to produce consistent results.

​

The challenge is not intelligence or motivation. More often, students have never been explicitly or consistently taught how to manage their own learning.

​

Faced with multiple subjects, competing demands, and limited time in the evenings, students often study reactively rather than intentionally. They default to whatever feels most immediate or familiar: rewriting notes, re-reading content, or “doing some math” without a clear goal. 

​

When time is scarce, how students learn matters just as much as how long they study. Yet learning itself is rarely taught as a skill.

​

What we’re getting wrong about learning 

​​

We can’t blame students for these shortcomings in their learning strategies. 

Most curricula focus heavily on the what of learning: the content and knowledge students are expected to master. Far less attention is given to the how: how to plan learning, how to study effectively, and how to adapt when strategies are not working.

There is often an implicit assumption that students will work this out on their own; that through effort, experience, and maturity, effective learning habits will simply emerge.

For some students, early academic success can mask an underlying absence of learning systems, allowing students to coast without developing the skills needed to manage increasing complexity. However, as content becomes more complex and workloads increase, those advantages are no longer enough, and when performance falters, it is often misinterpreted as a motivation or discipline issue, rather than a gap in learning strategy and self-management.

Zooming out, this matters more than ever. Today’s students are learning in a world defined by rapid technological change, evolving labour markets, and increasing complexity. Their ability to understand how learning works, and to apply that understanding across subjects and contexts, is becoming a foundational life skill.

Learning scientists refer to this capacity as self-regulated learning.

Self-regulated learning: the foundation of effective study 

​

At its core, strong learning comes down to three things. Good learners plan. They execute. They reflect.

Self-regulated learning describes the process by which students actively plan their learning, apply effective strategies, and evaluate what is and is not working. It is consistently associated with higher achievement, greater confidence, and deeper understanding.

​

In practice, however, many students struggle with all three components. As one Year 12 student put it to me:

“The easy part is studying. The hard part is figuring out what and how to study.”

​

Insights from practice: why students struggle

​

Many students want to master their learning. They work hard, they care, they want to do well. And those that may not appear to demonstrate those tendencies often want those things and experience an underlying frustration with their learning. 

Planning

My experience has shown me that many students — even dedicated, ambitious, high-performing students — have not yet developed the know-how to lead their own learning. Instead, they rely on vague intentions or default habits. Metacognition provides direction and enables adjustment over time.

These approaches may feel productive, but are often disconnected from priorities.

A lack of planning — perhaps beyond completing assigned tasks from teachers — can lead to an ad hoc approach to study. It’s all too common for students to wind up leaving assignments to the last minute. And while time pressure can motivate some students in the short term, it more often leads to late submissions, neglect of other subjects, and increased stress.

By contrast, students who plan deliberately tend to stay on track. The most effective approach I see is reverse planning: students receive an assessment notification, work backwards from deadlines, break tasks into milestones, and schedule specific study sessions aligned to clear goals. Planning, in this sense, is not about control. It is about reducing friction.

​

Execution

​

When it comes to studying, many students rely on low-impact study strategies such as highlighting or re-reading notes. These approaches are comfortable and familiar, but they rarely lead to deep learning. 

This tendency is not accidental: high-impact study techniques are often not explicitly taught, or not meaningfully absorbed when they are. As one student put it, “They took us to a lecture hall for a seminar that nobody pays attention to.”

In the absence of clear instruction and practice, students default to strategies that feel productive but do little to strengthen understanding.

​

Reflection

Lastly, upon task completion, students rarely reflect unless prompted. Feedback from teachers — despite being one of the most powerful tools for improvement — is often skimmed or avoided altogether. This is not because students don’t care, but because feedback can trigger frustration, disappointment, or a perceived threat to their self-concept.

Students who develop reflective habits are not perfect learners, but they are adaptive with an apparatus to help support their learning. They notice patterns in their behaviour, recognise what helps them focus, their shortcomings, and adjust accordingly. Over time, this reduces unnecessary stress and builds confidence.

Ultimately, many students could avoid unnecessary stress, late nights before a due date, and even burnout by being taught simple planning tools.​

​

The cognitive systems that facilitate self-regulated learning

​

The difficulties students experience with planning, follow-through, and reflection are often framed as issues of effort, attitude, or discipline. In reality, they are better understood as challenges of cognitive development and system design.

​

Self-regulated learning is supported by two interacting cognitive systems: executive function and metacognition. Together, they enable students to manage complexity, adapt to feedback, and direct their effort effectively over time.

Planning: reducing cognitive load and enabling control

Planning is not merely an organisational preference; it is a cognitive strategy that reduces mental load and enables executive control. It has a rich empirical backing, being associated with reduced cognitive load, higher GPA, and lower stress.

Executive functions are higher-order cognitive processes that support goal-directed behaviour, including working memory, attentional control, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition. These systems are developing throughout adolescence. As academic demands increase, students are often expected to manage workloads that exceed the capacity of their developing executive systems.

When students do not plan, they are forced to make decisions on the fly: What subject should I work on? Where do I start? How long should I spend? Each of these decisions consumes working memory and increases cognitive load, leaving fewer resources available for learning itself.

​

Planning offloads these decisions in advance. By externalising priorities, schedules, and milestones, students reduce extraneous cognitive load and free up mental capacity for understanding. This is why students often report feeling calmer and more focused once a clear plan is in place — or as one student put it: “planning helped me figure out the what, when, where, and how of study, so I could just focus on actually doing the work.” 

​

Planning also supports task initiation. For many students, the hardest part of studying is getting started. Specific plans create what psychologists call implementation intentions: not just “I’ll study English this week,” but “I’ll work on my essay from 7–8pm on Monday and Wednesday.” These concrete intentions dramatically increase follow-through.

Execution: directing effort toward high-impact learning 

Once a plan is in place, execution depends on how students allocate attention and effort — and whether they engage in strategies that promote durable learning.

Many commonly used study strategies are cognitively comfortable but educationally weak. Re-reading notes, highlighting, or passively watching videos creates an illusion of learning without strengthening memory or understanding. These strategies persist because they feel productive and require less cognitive effort.

High-impact learning strategies do the opposite. They deliberately introduce desirable difficulty. Retrieval practice, explaining ideas in one’s own words, generating questions, and practising under exam conditions place greater demands on executive control and working memory. In doing so, they strengthen the mental representations that support long-term learning.

Effective execution is not about working harder; it’s about increasing germane cognitive load, the effort devoted to building understanding, rather than expending energy on disorganisation or distraction.

Reflection: metacognition as the engine of adaptation

Reflection is where learning becomes adaptive rather than repetitive.

Metacognition refers to awareness and regulation of one’s own thinking. It allows students to notice when they do not understand something, evaluate whether a strategy is working, and adjust accordingly.

Without metacognition, students may repeat the same ineffective strategies simply because they are familiar with them. Metacognition empowers them to make informed changes. They learn not just what to do, but why certain approaches work better for them.

Reflection also plays a critical role in emotional regulation. Students who reflect constructively are better able to interpret setbacks as information rather than failure. Over time, this builds confidence, resilience, and a sense of agency.

​

How executive function and metacognition work together

Executive function provides the capacity for control and execution. Metacognition provides the insight needed to guide and refine that control.

A useful way to think about this is that executive function keeps the system running, while metacognition provides direction and enables adjustment over time. Together, they form the cognitive engine of self-regulated learning.

When students learn to plan deliberately, execute strategically, and reflect consistently, they shift from being carried through their education to actively directing it.

​​

​​

What helps students develop these skills

Developing self-regulated learning is not about adding more pressure or workload. It is about helping students build simple systems that reduce friction and increase clarity over time — and fundamentally, set students up for success beyond school. Both parents and educators play a role — not by doing the learning for students, but by teaching them how to lead it themselves.

What parents can do

​

Parents do not need to be subject experts to support self-regulated learning. The most powerful support is often structural rather than just instructional.

​

Support planning by building a shared system

​

Rather than asking, “Have you done your homework?”, parents can help students externalise their thinking.

• Sit with your child once a week to map upcoming assessments and commitments.

• Help them break large tasks into smaller milestones.

• Model planning out loud: “If this is due in three weeks, what would make sense to do first?”
   

A helpful progression is:

• Show them how to plan,

• Do it together,

• Gradually step back as they take ownership.

​

The goal is not control, but transfer of responsibility.

​

Support execution by encouraging high-impact strategies

​

Many students equate effort with time spent. Parents can help reframe effort as quality of strategy.

• Encourage active strategies such as explaining ideas aloud, self-testing, or teaching someone else.

• Normalise struggle as a sign of effective learning, not failure (desirable difficulties).

• Reinforce that spacing study over time promotes durable learning.

​

Over time, this helps students associate effort with progress, not just endurance.

​

Encourage reflection at natural checkpoints

Reflection is most effective when used strategically, from quick in-the-moment adjustments to deeper reviews at the end of a term or assessment cycle.

• At the end of a term or assessment block, have students write down reflections for each of these three questions:

  • What went well?

  • What didn’t go so well?

  • What will you implement next time?

• Encourage students to revisit feedback once emotions have settled.

​

This helps students extract learning from experience rather than simply moving on.

What educators can do

Despite strong evidence for its efficacy, self-regulated learning remains insufficiently embedded in many classrooms. Strategy instruction is often assumed rather than explicitly taught.

​

Schools can make a meaningful difference by integrating learning strategies into everyday teaching.

​

Teach planning explicitly

​

• Model how to decode assessment notifications. 

• Show students how to backwards-plan from deadlines.

• Make expectations about time, effort, and standards visible.

Planning should be taught as a cognitive skill, not left to chance.

​

Practise effective learning strategies in class

​

• Build retrieval practice into lessons; interpolated testing (mid-class) can be highly effective and also reduce mind wandering.

• Use techniques like blurting, low-stakes quizzes, or explain-your-thinking tasks.

• Make the purpose of these strategies explicit.

​

Students are more likely to use high-impact strategies when they have practised them with guidance.

​

Create space for reflection

​

Reflection is most powerful when it is structured and normalised.

• Allocate time for students to reflect on feedback.

• Encourage students to articulate what they would change next time.

• Frame mistakes as information, not failure.

​

Over time, this builds metacognitive awareness and learning confidence.

​

The bigger picture: why this matters beyond school

The future of work demands adaptability, autonomy, and lifelong learning. Students who understand how to learn are better equipped to navigate uncertainty, master new skills, and thrive in changing environments.

​

In this sense, cultivating self-regulated learning is not only an academic priority: it is an ethical one that should be a central mission of contemporary education. 

​

When students learn how to plan, execute, and reflect effectively, they gain more than improved grades. They gain agency. They develop self-efficacy. And they position themselves to take on the next learning task — whatever that may be. 

​

Learning science may not sound glamorous, but few things are more important in pedagogy. Whether we aspire to be chefs, engineers, creators, or leaders, mastery requires learning. And increasingly, it requires learning how to learn.